jsancio commented on a change in pull request #10899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10899#discussion_r655542285



##########
File path: 
raft/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/raft/internals/BatchAccumulator.java
##########
@@ -233,6 +235,68 @@ public void appendLeaderChangeMessage(LeaderChangeMessage 
leaderChangeMessage, l
         }
     }
 
+
+    public void appendSnapshotHeaderMessage(MetadataSnapshotHeaderRecord 
snapshotHeaderRecord) {
+        appendLock.lock();
+        try {
+            // Ideally there should be nothing in the batch here.
+            // TODO verify this

Review comment:
       It is a valid/correct check but it doesn't cover all of the cases. For 
example, in theory `SnapshotWriter` could do the following:
   ```
   accumulator.appendSnapshotHeaderMessage(...);
   snapshot.appendBatches(accumulator.drain());
   accumulator.appendSnapshotHeaderMessage(...);
   ```
   
   This is okay from the `BatchAccumulator`'s point of view because the 
accumulator doesn't have enough information. I am also not sure if we want to 
encode the invariant of `SnapshotHeaderMessage` and `SnaspshotFooterMessage` 
into the `BatchAccumulator`.
   
   I think only the `SnapshotWriter` has enough information to make these 
invariant checks. What do you think?
   




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to