[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17383338#comment-17383338
]
Ismael Juma commented on KAFKA-13103:
-------------------------------------
What would be the justification for `GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED`?
`REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS` seems really important though, would this be something
we want to do for 3.0? Or is there a reason why it's ok for now?
> Should group admin handlers consider REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and
> GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-13103
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13103
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: David Jacot
> Assignee: Luke Chen
> Priority: Major
>
> [~rajinisiva...@gmail.com] and I were discussing if we should consider
> REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors in
> the group handlers. I think that this could make sense, especially for
> `REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS`. `GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED` is more debatable as it
> means that the handler would retry until the request timeout is reached. It
> might be armful if the authorisation is really denied.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
