[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17383338#comment-17383338 ]
Ismael Juma commented on KAFKA-13103: ------------------------------------- What would be the justification for `GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED`? `REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS` seems really important though, would this be something we want to do for 3.0? Or is there a reason why it's ok for now? > Should group admin handlers consider REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and > GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors? > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: KAFKA-13103 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13103 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: David Jacot > Assignee: Luke Chen > Priority: Major > > [~rajinisiva...@gmail.com] and I were discussing if we should consider > REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors in > the group handlers. I think that this could make sense, especially for > `REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS`. `GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED` is more debatable as it > means that the handler would retry until the request timeout is reached. It > might be armful if the authorisation is really denied. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)