[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17431420#comment-17431420
 ] 

Guozhang Wang commented on KAFKA-13386:
---------------------------------------

Hello [~sduran] thanks for reporting your issue. My understanding is that when 
the serializer's behavior changes upon an upgrade, records may then be sending 
to a different partition after the upgrade, is that what you're suggesting? I'm 
not sure though how that would cause valid records to be filtered, could you 
elaborate a bit?

> Foreign Key Join filtering out valid records after a code change / schema 
> evolved
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-13386
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13386
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: streams
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.2
>            Reporter: Sergio Duran Vegas
>            Priority: Major
>
> The join optimization assumes the serializer is deterministic and invariant 
> across upgrades. So in case of changes this opimitzation will drop 
> invalid/intermediate records. In other situations we have relied on the same 
> property, for example when computing whether an update is a duplicate result 
> or not.
>  
> The problem is that some serializers are sadly not deterministic.
>  
> [https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/internals/foreignkeyjoin/SubscriptionResolverJoinProcessorSupplier.java]
>  
> {code:java}
> //If this value doesn't match the current value from the original table, it 
> is stale and should be discarded.
>  if (java.util.Arrays.equals(messageHash, currentHash)) {{code}
>  
> A solution for this problem would be that the comparison use foreign-key 
> reference itself instead of the whole message hash.
>  
> The bug fix proposal is to be allow the user to choose between one method of 
> comparison or another (whole hash or Fk reference). This would fix the 
> problem of dropping valid records on certain cases and allow the user to also 
> choose the current optimized way of checking valid records and intermediate 
> results dropping.
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to