C0urante edited a comment on pull request #11869:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11869#issuecomment-1067097745


   Thanks for finding and fixing this @sunshujie1990! Changes like this one 
should usually come with a unit test to verify that the original bug exists, 
and that the proposed fix addresses it.
   
   I've drafted a small addition to an existing test case that should 
accomplish this in a personal fork that also includes your commit for this PR: 
https://github.com/C0urante/kafka/commit/ddd64ebc6400b9044a1358cf18c23d3d914d1f90
   
   If that looks good to you, feel free to cherry-pick onto your branch and 
make any adjustments that you'd like.
   
   Given that the issue can be reproduced via unit test and that this fix does 
address it (by causing the test to pass), this LGTM once it has test coverage 
added.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to