dajac commented on a change in pull request #11912: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11912#discussion_r829771763
########## File path: clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/common/requests/MetadataRequestTest.java ########## @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ import org.apache.kafka.common.errors.UnsupportedVersionException; import org.apache.kafka.common.message.MetadataRequestData; import org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.ApiKeys; +import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertDoesNotThrow; Review comment: nit: We usually put static imports after the imports. Could we move it down? I think that we could put it right before the other static imports. ########## File path: clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/common/requests/MetadataRequestTest.java ########## @@ -74,20 +75,30 @@ public void testMetadataRequestVersion() { @Test public void testTopicIdAndNullTopicNameRequests() { // Construct invalid MetadataRequestTopics. We will build each one separately and ensure the error is thrown. - List<MetadataRequestData.MetadataRequestTopic> topics = Arrays.asList( + List<MetadataRequestData.MetadataRequestTopic> invalidTopics = Arrays.asList( new MetadataRequestData.MetadataRequestTopic().setName(null).setTopicId(Uuid.randomUuid()), new MetadataRequestData.MetadataRequestTopic().setName(null), new MetadataRequestData.MetadataRequestTopic().setTopicId(Uuid.randomUuid()), new MetadataRequestData.MetadataRequestTopic().setName("topic").setTopicId(Uuid.randomUuid())); + List<MetadataRequestData.MetadataRequestTopic> validTopics = Arrays.asList( Review comment: nit: Would it make sense to split this test into two tests, one for the valid cases and one for the invalid cases? I think that it would be easier to read. ########## File path: clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/requests/MetadataResponse.java ########## @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ public Cluster buildCluster() { if (metadata.error == Errors.NONE) { if (metadata.isInternal) internalTopics.add(metadata.topic); - if (metadata.topicId() != null && metadata.topicId() != Uuid.ZERO_UUID) { + if (metadata.topicId() != null && !Uuid.ZERO_UUID.equals(metadata.topicId())) { Review comment: Could we add a unit test to cover this one? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org