>Some ideas on making unique names:
>1. use the ThreadGroup name, not "JMeterThread". Or both.
The ThreadGroup name makes more sense, as it probably
carries more information.
>2. Number each thread in the ThreadGroup 1...N
Agreed.
>3. Create a unique identifier number, based on current time stamp (in
>milliseconds), host ip, and a 128-bit random number.
>
>Make a string from all these parts, example: "JMeterThread-Test Group
>1-5-329832845092375487932479795893923"
>It's kinda big, but it has everything for everyone, splittable on "-"
>(or some other agreed upon char).
Sounds good to me. I'm not sure what the random number contributes,
though. If it is to preserve the uniqueness of the test results, they will
probably collide at some extremely unlikely conjuncture. Perhaps it might
be better to allow for thread-numbering to start after the last previously
used thread (i.e. N + 1) ?
Regards
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
