DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44224>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44224 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-14 05:37 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This is how Copy/Paste is supposed to work. > > If you select a test element, that element (and all its children) are copied. > > So selecting one of the children of a selected element selects it twice - > once > as a child, and once as an independent element. When pasted, these two > selections appear as siblings as expected. Yes, you are right. It is how it works. But are you sure it is correct behaviour? For example, I selected diapason from 1st sampler to 2nd with expanded 1st sampler element for copying: -ThreadGroup +-If Controller +-1st HTTP Sampler (selected from) +--Assertion +-2nd HTTP Sampler (selected to) As for me it is not clear that Assertion element will be pasted twice. I can't remember any tree which works like this. And can you give the example when this is useful? It is necessary to write additional documentation for supporting this feature. And I had a bug in my test plan after this operation. Because additional elements were pasted in my plan. :) IMHO this logic is rather confused. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
