https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47511
--- Comment #5 from Sebb <s...@apache.org> 2009-07-30 01:49:24 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I think there are two problems here: > > > > 1) BSF 2.4.0 was coded against Jython 2.1. It seems that some later releases > > are not compatible. > > Do you plan to support Jython 2.5 (as well as include the latest version of > BSF) in the next minor release of JMeter? Yes, will move to BSF 3.0 for the next release. BSF 3.0/JSR-223 does not distinguish scripts and expressions; everything is an expression returning an Object (might be null). > Or perhaps sooner in some new nightly > build (based on the priority of other bugs as well, of course)? That will happen when the code has been added to SVN. > > 2) Ambiguity over what constitutes an "eval" script in BSF. > > > > If you use Jython 2.1, the sampler will work provided that the script is a > > Jython expression, such as "5" or "6+7". > > If I create a BSF sampler that's set to use Jython, then being restricted to > only use a single JPython expression (as opposed to multiple JPython > statements) is severely limiting. On the surface, it seems that a fix to > JMeter > to enable complete integration with Jython would be low-hanging fruit and > provide a lot of bang-for-the-buck, bringing the complete richness of Jython > to > JMeter samplers. I'm not familiar with JMeter's code, so I could be totally > off-base here on how much work is involved to fully support a "true" Jython > script containing any number of statements (as can be done with a BeanShell > sampler) rather than just supporting a single Python expression. The problem is in BSF 2.4/Jython, not JMeter. Having said that, there is code in JMeter to work-round a similar problem with BSF 2.4/Jexl. > I have a thought... So if instead of using a BeanShell Sampler I were to use a > BSF Sampler that's set to BeanShell, then would I have the same limitation? No. > ie, > Would this sampler be restricted to a single BeanShell expression instead of > being able to use multiple BeanShell statements? If that's the case, then > maybe > what's needed is to create a separate JythonSampler (in addition to the > BeanShellSampler and BSFSampler). No. > Given that "The Grinder 3" load testing tool > uses Jython, I think that having a new JythonSampler sampler in JMeter would > make it easier to migrate Jython scripts between the JMeter and The Grinder, > esp when the dev group uses The Grinder but the QA group uses JMeter. > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > Will -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
