On 26/09/2009, Milamber <milambersp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Le 26/09/2009 14:18, sebb a ecrit : > > > On 26/09/2009, Milamber <milambersp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > In attachment, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > May I request that patches are provided via Buzilla in future? > > It's a lot easier to keep track of them that way. > > > > > Sorry, I will do this next time.
Thanks! [No need to apologise.] > > > The dev or user list are good for discussion of any proposals, but > > patches are best done via Bugzilla. > > > > > > > > > a proposal patch to change position of new "Proxy Server" > > > panel to the end of page. More user-friendly (I think) > > > (see screenshots) > > > > > > > > > > Not 100% sure about that, will need to consider further. > > > > > I think this visual order is better : > 1/ Label&comment > 2/ Webserver > 3/ HTTP Request > 4/ Request via Proxy Server > 5/ Optional tasks > > than : > 1/ Label&comment > 2/ Webserver > 3/ Request via Proxy Server > 4/ HTTP Request > 5/ Optional tasks > > Because, we are in a sampler HTTP Request, and I think is better to have > panel "HTTP Request" first. > > "Request via Proxy Server" is optional and HTTP Request panel is (always) > required. > > I think too, the proposal's order is more better for beginner. I put it with the Webserver because that's the way I think of it - as a pre-requisite for requesting the URL. However, I can see why it might be better at the bottom with other optional items. I'll consider it some more. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
