that depends on your production environment. getting the images is bandwidth intensive. it doesn't really test the application. sites with performance requirements tend to put the images on a separate server, so testing without getting the images is valid.
does that help answer the question? peter On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 03:03:02 -0800 (PST), Shankar s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all, > > We usually test the performance of any application skipping the gif, jpeg and > swf files in the script(you can consider this scenario in whatever tool you > use). > > For one of the application we tested, we found that inclusion of these files > makes the reponse time increase considerably. > > Kindly let me know what is the general practice? Are these gif, jpeg and swf > files excluded are included in the scripts and what is the impact you have > experienced? > > Thanks for your suggestions > > Regards > Shankar > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > Meet the all-new My Yahoo! â Try it today! > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
