\s* would be better ;-)

I think it will be much easier to replace the variable bits with
something fixed (e.g. nothing) before trying any comparisons.

This should all be possible using the BeanShell Assertion - at least
for proof of concept.

S.
On 4/27/05, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you'll have to take drastic steps like replacing all white space
> characters with \S* constructs, since whitespace could be tabs, spaces,
> linefeeds, carriage returns...
> 
> The only way I ever have success with big regexes is to build them up
> from tiny to large, whereas you are trying to start out with the whole
> shebang.
> 
> -Mike
> 
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 11:54 +1000, Sonam Chauhan wrote:
> > Hi Mike, Sebb -
> >
> > > It would be hard - there could be dozens or even hundreds of characters
> > > that need to be escaped else they'll be treated as funky regular
> > > expression signifiers.
> >
> > I played around on this a while back... I recall I used a Perl script to
> > process the text to escape metacharacters. (I used the quotemeta builtin
> > Perl function that escapes just about everything not alphanumeric with a
> > backslash - even spaces!). I could not get it to work though - even with
> > modifiers. I _suspect_ it could be a line terminator issue - I suspect Java
> > does something strange with line terminations of text pasted into a textbox.
> >
> >
> > Obviously, even if it works, a 4-step process involving external tools isn't
> > practical for everyday use. Ideally, an 'Enhanced Response Assertion'
> > element would allow me to simply paste in a full document, mark certain of
> > text, and edit them as regular expressions (these would then display in a
> > different font or color).
> >
> > Seb, you also mentioned:
> > > > The Regex Tester might help here.
> >
> > I haven't used one so far -- is there a specific one you had in mind?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sonam Chauhan
> > --
> > Electronic Commerce, Corporate Express Australia Ltd.
> > Phone: +61-2-9335-0725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Michael Stover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 26 April 2005 11:25 PM
> > > To: jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Regression Testing w/ JMeter
> > >
> > > It would be hard - there could be dozens or even hundreds of characters
> > > that need to be escaped else they'll be treated as funky regular
> > > expression signifiers.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 11:18 +0100, sebb wrote:
> > > > Clever idea - should work.
> > > > But it is harder to make work than removing/replacing the variable
> > > > bits as you are finding!
> > > >
> > > > The modifiers such as (?m) and (?s) do work in JMeter.
> > > >
> > > > Note that these can change the meaning of ".", ^ $ etc
> > > >
> > > > The Regex Tester might help here.
> > > >
> > > > S.
> > > > On 4/26/05, Sonam Chauhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Or one could develop a new Assertion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You might still need to add a way to edit the responses to remove
> > > the
> > > > > > variable data.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sebb and Keith - I tried something similar with plain response
> > > assertions
> > > > > and regexs... my intention was to get JMeter to act as a rudimentary
> > > diff
> > > > > facility (it just signals if something is different), but I may have
> > > run
> > > > > into a limitation the regex support.
> > > > >
> > > > > The usual way to use Response Assertions is setting snippets of text
> > > (which
> > > > > may have regexs) in an assertion. JMeter then tries to match the
> > > response
> > > > > body (or headers) against it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it possible to assert a suitably processed multiline document? I
> > > was
> > > > > thinking of something like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Take the _entire_ body response from a server
> > > > > 2. Replace the variable bits with suitable regular expressions
> > > > > 3. Quote any other regex metacharacters
> > > > > 4. Take the text processed this way, and set it as a JMeter response
> > > > > assertion
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried doing this - JMeter lets me paste in this multi-line text into
> > > the
> > > > > assertion textbox with no problems, but try as I might, I could not it
> > > to
> > > > > work. I also tried using Perl5 extended regular expressions of
> > > multiline
> > > > > matching - i.e., instead of /abc/m, I set the assertion to (?m)abc -
> > > but no
> > > > > go.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like your thoughts on this issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Sonam Chauhan
> > > > > --
> > > > > Electronic Commerce, Corporate Express Australia Ltd.
> > > > > Phone: +61-2-9335-0725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, 25 April 2005 10:51 PM
> > > > > > To: JMeter Users List
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Regression Testing w/ JMeter
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Post-Processor Save Responses to a File was partly introduced
> > > with
> > > > > > this in mind.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This takes a name prefix (which I think can be a variable) so you
> > > can
> > > > > > run the test twice, saving the results to two sets of files, and
> > > then
> > > > > > use some other tool to do comparisons of the files.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You may need to pre-process the files to remove some dynamic data
> > > > > > (e.g. dates/times) before doing the diffs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There's no differencing capability built into JMeter at present.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, I guess the Save Responses test element could be extended
> > > to
> > > > > > include a second filename prefix, and could save the new data and
> > > then
> > > > > > compare it. Not sure offhand how this should report differences - I
> > > > > > think it may run too late to change the failure status - but it
> > > could
> > > > > > certainly log a message.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or one could develop a new Assertion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You might still need to add a way to edit the responses to remove
> > > the
> > > > > > variable data.
> > > > > > I think this could be done using another Post-Processor (BeanShell
> > > > > > Assertion should be usable here) that gets run before the Saver gets
> > > > > > the result. Or this could be added to the Saver itself (easier to
> > > > > > understand).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I suggest you try using external comparisons first, as this will
> > > give
> > > > > > a better idea of the sort of text that might need to be removed from
> > > > > > the responses before diffing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > S.
> > > > > > On 4/25/05, Keith Weicksel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > I was wondering if anyone used JMeter to regression test a site.
> > > > > > > Particularily, what I am looking for is the ability to:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1 - create a baseline tests for some path in our site (storing the
> > > > > > > HTML/DOM response somewhere)
> > > > > > > 2 - run the same test again after changes were made to the site
> > > and be
> > > > > > > able to DIFF the responses (showing the differences somehow)
> > > > > > > 3 - if there are changes (and they are OK), replace the baseline
> > > > > > > responses with the new valid ones
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have used JMeter for about a month now, and do not believe it
> > > has this
> > > > > > > functionality built right into it at this point.  My question is
> > > what is
> > > > > > > the extent of the regression testing ability buiilt into JMeter?
> > > And
> > > > > > > how difficult would it be to add this functionaility to it
> > > myselft?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Keith
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to