Oh ok, I thought there was a sample counter in there as well, but it looks like just the start time and sampled time, so it's as you say, pretty simple. I'll let the list know once I get around to doing this, I will probably do it in Java (since JMeter users obviously already have it) and not do anything too fancy re the algorithm.
Will On 11/23/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 23/11/05, Will Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's a good idea, thanks. So has anyone already written the "merge N > JTL > > files together" script? I'd prefer to have them together anyway for > > analysis with other tools beyond the jmeter visualizers (though they're > > great). > > In the case of CSV files, all you need to do is concatenate and then sort > them. > > What language were you thinking of using for the script? > > > Thanks! > > > > Will > > > > On 11/23/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > one option is to use the timer functionality in the threadGroup to > start > > > the test. this does mean all the systems have to be sync-ed. One other > > > option might be to extend the listener to allow multiple file > selections. > > > for example, like extending ResultCollector so that any listener can > take > > > multiple .JTL files > > > > > > peter > > > > > > > > > On 11/23/05, Will Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I am aware of the remote testing capability, though for distributing > > > > test > > > > clietns across the net it is not reasonable to have RMI connectivyt > > > > between > > > > them. Rather, I am running multiple independent tests (all in > console > > > > mode) > > > > to generate maximum possible real-world load against a server. I > was > > > > about > > > > to wrtie some scritp to merge the JTL files together (CSV versions, > > > > since I > > > > am doing stuff with the results in Excel), but it just ocurred to me > > > > that > > > > this may already have been done (a tool like mergelog for clf > files). > > > > > > > > I realize that without true connectivity between the machines it > won't > > > > be > > > > possible for the tests to be truly accurate (due to time sync > issues) > > > > but am > > > > assuming that as long as I can increment the sampler numbers > > > > appropriately > > > > (so there are not multiple instances of 1-N), I should have a pretty > > > > > meaningful aggregate result. > > > > > > > > Does anyone have any pointers? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
