It just occurred to me that I could use a regular expression that
utilizes a 'lookbehind' aspect - except that it doesn't seem to work.
Does the JMeter/ORO support lookbehind as a regular expression?

chris

Chris Hansen wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> On 27/07/06, Chris Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> My name is Chris Hansen; nice to meet you!
>>>
>>> I'm working for the first time with  Jmeter and while I've got most of
>>> what I need from the website and wiki, I have a case I can't quite
>>> figure out how to make work and I was wondering if you knew how to do it
>>> or if you had a ready reference you could refer me to.
>>>
>>> I've been using the Regular Expression Extractor from the Post
>>> Processors and it works fine for me except in one case.  My regular
>>> expression matches in two places in the returning XML where I need it to
>>> match in one.
>> Surely that is not a problem - just choose the appropriate match, either
>> 1 or 2?
>>
>>> <CAPs>
>>>  <CAP>
>>>    <Keys>
>>>      <Key>KEY1</Key>
>>>      <Key>KEY2</Key>
>>>      <Key>KEY3</Key>
>>>    </Keys>
>>> ...
>>>    <Parcels>
>>>      <Parcel>
>>>        <CAPs>
>>>            <CAP>
>>>              <Keys>
>>>                <Key>KEY1</Key>
>>>                <Key>KEY2</Key>
>>>                <Key>KEY3</Key>
>>>              </Keys>
>>> ...
> 
> Sorry, I wasn't very clear there was I.
> 
> It is actually a list of CAPs and each CAP can have a list of Parcels
> which in turn can have a list of attached CAPs.  The application won't
> recurse beyond that, but what I need to get is the Keys element out of
> the CAP list, but not include the Keys element out of the CAPs attached
> to the Parcels.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> chris
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to