I've been able to get it working with 1.4.  Right now I'm fighting the
GUI config portion of the assertion. Where would the best place for any
patches to be sent, here or the -dev list?

/Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:17 PM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch

Java 5 is not on the roadmap at present.

We have abandoned support for Java 1.3, but there are too many people
still using Java 1.4. There was a long discussion about this earlier
this year.

You can of course create your own samplers that rely on Java 5.

S.
On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It is possible to lump multiple XSDs into one validator.  I'll have to

> modify my existing code to not use the Java 5 specific methods, but I 
> know it is possible.
>
> Unfortunately the cleanest way of doing it does require the 
> javax.xml.validation API.  See 
> http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-javaxmlvalidapi.ht
> ml for a detailed example.  To use multiple XSDs you declare a 
> different Source for each XSD then create an array of all Source 
> classes that is passed into the factory.newSchema() method.
>
> What is the roadmap for moving to Java 5 as the required JVM?  Or is 
> it on the roadmap at all?
>
> /Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:56 AM
> To: JMeter Users List
> Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch
>
> I don't think it's possible to provide multiple files to the
assertion.
>
> However, you can have multiple assertions applied to the same sample 
> result.
>
> I don't know anything about the underlying XML API, but unless it's 
> possible to provide multiple files to a single validation invocation, 
> then using multiple assertions won't be much slower.
>
> Also, I think assertions stop being processed as soon as one fails.
>
> S.
> On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Thanks.
> >
> > I'm trying to extend the XML Schema assertion to make it able to use

> > multiple XSD files during the validation.  Of course, if it's 
> > possible
>
> > to do such now, please let me know so I don't waste my time. :-) 
> > Thanks!
> >
> > /Paul
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:44 AM
> > To: JMeter Users List
> > Subject: Re: Current JMeter development branch
> >
> > On 05/12/06, Paul Kuykendall (PL/EUS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What is the current development branch?  I saw a note saying that 
> > > the main head was out of date.  I've checked out branches/rel-2-2 
> > > but want
> >
> > > to make sure it's the right one before poking at it too much.
> >
> > Yes, that's the correct one.
> >
> > Perhaps we should a merge at some point, but it's a _lot_ of work.
> > [Or maybe we could do some judicious renames instead...]
> >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > /Paul
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to