Hi Peter, These articles are great. Thanks alot. By the way, do you also have articles related to "user based" testing ?
I would appreciate it if anybody can refer me docs covering this topic. Thank you Jian ------------------------------------------ Jian Tong - QA Production and Operations, CBC.ca Extension: 3357 Location: 2C400-N ------------------------------------------- >>> "Peter Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/14/06 6:45 PM >>> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/articles/performance.pdf http://cvs.apache.org/~woolfel/article.zip On 12/14/06, Ron Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Peter, I searched for your article but couldn't find it. Would you > please send a link to it? > > Ron > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:24 PM > To: JMeter Users List > Subject: Re: Throughput in Aggregate report > > usually I look at the capacity of the network and determine if the > bytes/sec > is going to saturate the bandwidth or not. I have an article in the > wiki > that explains this stuff in detail. > > peter > > On 12/14/06, Jian Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > As you said bytes/sec and requests/sec are better metrics for load > > testing, then I hope to know what the benchmark is for bytes/sec and > > requests/sec from your experience ? > > > > Thanks > > > > Jian Tong > > > > >>> "Peter Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/13/06 8:29 PM >>> > > jmeter will measure the requests per second. that isn't the same as > pages > > per second for a couple of reasons. > > > > 1. a page may have multiple images and stuff embedded > > 2. images are cached by the browser the first time it's loaded > > 3. not every page is the same, so page per second a poor measurement > of > > load > > 4. bytes per second or requests per second is a better measurement > > 5. what happens when the pages change and a page ends up having more > > images? > > > > loadRunner is a good product. Pages downloaded per second isn't all > that > > useful from a capacity and planning perspective. It is much better to > > measure bytes/second and requests/second. > > > > my bias opinion. > > > > peter > > > > On 12/13/06, rmiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > We use Pages Downloaded per Second as a performance metric in > > LoadRunner. > > > In > > > side by side tests with LoadRunner and JMeter there dosen't seem to > be > > any > > > correlation between that metric in LoadRunner and Throughput in > JMeter. > > > Can > > > someone please explain how to get the eaquivalent metric in JMeter? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Ron > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-in-Aggregate-report-tf2817925.html#a786 > 5207 > > > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
