Actually, that's about the exact configuration across all 7 of them. On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:58 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06/06/2008, Michael McDonnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One would think so, but my response times are terrible, I'm wondering if > it > > has anything to do with the fact that its a 1st gen p4. > > (Ubuntu Hardy, 1.5 Gig PC3200 RAM) > > > > What node is that? > > You wrote: > > "Then we run the test from a single user work station (same test, 300 users > doing work) and our results come back fantastically!" > > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:44 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, 300 users should not be a problem as a single JMeter client > > > should be able to handle that. > > > > > > On 06/06/2008, Michael McDonnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That makes sense. I'll give it a go. (We're pretty sure there's no > bottle > > > > neck passing things, they do it every 100 samples, and this is over > a > > > 100 > > > > MB/s net. I'm only trying to run 300 users, so they should be able > to > > > > perform well over a 10 MB/s > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:27 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In client-server mode, only the test plan is sent from the client > to > > > > > the server(s). > > > > > > > > > > Any additional files - e.g. CSV input files - need to be present > on > > > > > the server host in the location specified by the test plan. > > > > > > > > > > Sample data is returned to the client, and processed/stored by > the > > > client. > > > > > This can become a bottleneck at the client - both for JMeter > itself, > > > > > and for the network connection - under high loads. > > > > > > > > > > Data files are best randomised before use. > > > > > Likewise, if you want to run with different data on different > hosts, > > > > > then create different data files for each host (but you can use > the > > > > > same name). > > > > > > > > > > On 06/06/2008, Michael McDonnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > How did you randomize the data from the CSVs? (if I may ask) > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, I'm dealing with a lot of optimistic locking issues > which > > > would > > > > > only > > > > > > occur if each csv is doing the EXACT same thing at the exact > same > > > time > > > > > > (which is completely likely) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Ryan Dooley < > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had a similar experience the first time. Turns out that > the > > > data I > > > > > > > wanted > > > > > > > to test with (HTTP POSTs) has to be put on each remote. I > also > > > had a > > > > > > > process to randomize the data when transferred to the > remotes. I > > > > > finally > > > > > > > got the load up high enough across 10 machines like yours. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The test harness I had was pretty simple: post these things > to > > > this > > > > > url. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Michael McDonnell < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We're running a distributed test (roughly 7 remote > > > workstations) on > > > > > a > > > > > > > > pretty > > > > > > > > hefty box (8 cores, 32 gigs ram.... etc...) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, something seems to be going wrong... perhaps its > > > because > > > > > I'm > > > > > > > > crossing linux and windows platforms to try to do the > testing? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We're load testing a web application, so primarily, the > only > > > work > > > > > we're > > > > > > > > doing is http requests (there are a few "java requests" > that > > > > > actually is > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > app I created to make webservice calls, but we'll get to > that > > > later) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, when we view the transactions in the database, > they > > > are > > > > > > > extremely > > > > > > > > low. (frighteningly low). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then we run the test from a single user work station (same > > > test, 300 > > > > > > > users > > > > > > > > doing work) and our results come back fantastically! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now granted: I guess the big deal is this: when the app > uses a > > > csv > > > > > in > > > > > > > > distributed mode, does each slave utilize the the same csv > in > > > the > > > > > same > > > > > > > > order > > > > > > > > ? or is there a sort of "break up" so that no two slaves > are > > > using > > > > > the > > > > > > > same > > > > > > > > line in the csv? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sorry for what may be dumb questions... but we're > coming > > > down to > > > > > a > > > > > > > > tight > > > > > > > > deadline, and the distributed testing is not giving us > good > > > results > > > > > where > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > the local testing is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for all your help in advance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
