On 16/02/2009, Noel O'Brien <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday 16 February 2009 16:35:56 sebb wrote:
>  > On 16/02/2009, Noel O'Brien <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > > On Monday 16 February 2009 15:42:46 sebb wrote:
>  > >  > On 16/02/2009, Noel O'Brien <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > >  > > Hi All,
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  The web application I'm testing uses JMS queues for communicating
>  > >  > > externally when certain events occur. The JMS point to point sampler
>  > >  > > in JMeter only provides for Request and Request/Response tests,
>  > >  > > however almost all of the messaging I will be testing will be driven
>  > >  > > by a HTTP request, i.e. make a HTTP request and there should be a
>  > >  > > corresponding message on a JMS queue.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  What is the best way to (at least) functionally test this? I was
>  > >  > > thinking of writing a JMS Assertion that I could add to the HTTP
>  > >  > > Request sampler, does that sound reasonable? The JMS message occurs
>  > >  > > as a result of the HTTP request being made so to me it makes sense
>  > >  > > for it to be an assertion.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Is the JMS message sent before the HTTP response is returned? Can one
>  > >  > guarantee this?
>  > >  > I thought JMS was asynchronous.
>  > >
>  > > JMS is indeed asynchronous. The HTTP response will always return first,
>  > > and the logic that puts the message on the queue is run in a background
>  > > thread which has a default pause interval or 30 seconds. So there would
>  > > be a maximum 30 second delay between the http request completing and the
>  > > message appearing on the queue
>  > >
>  > >  > I would expect the HTTP Response Assertion to be used for checking
>  > >  > that the HTTP response is OK, i.e. the page contains "message sent OK"
>  > >  > or whatever.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > >  Is there any other way of having a "Response" only JMS sampler?
>  > >  >
>  > >  > I've never used JMS, but isn't that what JMS Subscriber does?
>  > >
>  > > We are not using topic/subscriber model for JMS, but queues (FIFO). Will
>  > > the JMS Subscriber sampler work with queues?
>  >
>  > No idea, sorry.
>  >
>  > >  > i.e what does the intended JMS recipient do?
>  > >
>  > > The intended JMS recipient parses the message and does further
>  > > processing. In our example, it's an SMS gateway, but is outside the scope
>  > > of our app, so I do not need to test it. I do need to test that the
>  > > correct messages are coming off the queue (in quantity and content) and
>  > > will need to performance test it in future
>  >
>  > I meant - what JMS actions does the recipient do to acquire the
>  > message, not what it does with the message once received.
>
>
> I have no idea how the SMS gateway interacts with the queue, but as it's
>  written in Java I assume it would use the onMessage() function.

Presumably it will have to do something first in order to use that function.

>  I will investigate further the JMS Subscriber sampler and report my findings.

Thanks.

If it turns out that there is a missing aspect of JMS that JMeter
could implement, then we can see about adding it for a future release.

If none of the existing JMS samplers do what you want, then some code
will have to be written in order to solve your problem - whether as an
Assertion or a Sampler.

The BeanShell elements may be useful for prototyping.

>  Thanks for your help,
>
> Noel
>
>
>  > >  Regards,
>  > >
>  > > Noel
>  > >
>  > >  > >  Regards,
>  > >  > >  Noel
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > >  > >- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>  > >  > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>  > >  >
>  > >  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>  > >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to