Hello, You must know that SamplerSender is pluggable : - mode can also be the class name of an implementation of org.apache.jmeter.samplers.SampleSender
We for example developped an inhouse SampleSender that makes it as and even more efficient than GUI. Regards Philippe Mouawad On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, kootsoop <koots...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will update, but after I have gone through many different settings, I > still believe JMeter has a problem in server mode. It's better with > batching (or holding), but still not as good as running the applicaiton > standalone (in either GUI or non-GUI form). > > Thanks for the feedback! > > Ciao, > > Peter K. > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Philippe Mouawad [via JMeter] < > ml-node+s512774n4826209...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > For the reputation of JMeter it would be nice from you > > kootsoop< > > > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=user_nodes&user=256137 > >to > > > > update this with last news : > > > > > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/JMeter-GUI-vs-JMeter-Server-td4822852.html > > > > As you updated this one: > > > > > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-Performance-using-jmeter-server-VS-running-in-the-local-instance-td4631144.html > > > > To avoid people thinking that JMeter has problems in remote mode. > > > > Regards > > Philippe > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:12 PM, kootsoop <[hidden email]< > http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4826209&i=0>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>> The JMeter docs explain how to configure the server sample sending > > > >>> mode; you might find that statistical mode works for you. > > > > > > > >>Thanks! I'll check that out and see if it makes a difference, but I > > > really > > > think this is a JMeter server mode > > > >> issue. > > > > > > > > > > Well, I tried setting > > > > > > mode=Hold > > > > > > in the "Remote Batching Configuration" section of the jmeter.properties > > > file... and it did the trick! > > > > > > I've only tried this on one instance of the server (and one client), > but > > > without this setting I was getting only 400 requests per second. > > > > > > The downside of the "Hold" option is that it takes forever to send all > > the > > > data after the test has finished (a 1 minute 18 second test takes 9 > > minutes > > > to go from > > > > > > *Starting the test on...* > > > > > > to > > > > > > *Finished the test on...* > > > > > > But it performs the same was as running the test in the Client GUI > does. > > > > > > Thanks for the tip! > > > > > > It's still not clear to me why this didn't show up in any of the > > networking > > > / performance metrics... > > > > > > I'll try one of the other mode setting to see if that makes things > > easier. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-Performance-using-jmeter-server-VS-running-in-the-local-instance-tp4631144p4823875.html > > > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]< > http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4826209&i=1> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]< > http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4826209&i=2> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cordialement. > > Philippe Mouawad. > > Ubik-Ingénierie > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > > below: > > > > > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-Performance-using-jmeter-server-VS-running-in-the-local-instance-tp4631144p4826209.html > > To unsubscribe from Jmeter Performance using, jmeter-server VS running > in > > the local instance, click here< > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4631144&code=a29vdHNvb3BAZ21haWwuY29tfDQ2MzExNDR8MjA3NDUzMjY0NQ== > >. > > > > > > > > -- > Peter J. Kootsookos > West Hartford, CT 06117, USA > Skype: +1-860-269-0080 > Home: +1-860-206-7488 > Cell: +1-860-597-9829 > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-Performance-using-jmeter-server-VS-running-in-the-local-instance-tp4631144p4826212.html > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad. Ubik-Ingénierie
