On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, E.L. Willighagen wrote:

> Yes, I think so... but let's see what Miguel has to say about it...

Ok, I'm not in a hurry with this...  :)

> PS, it would also be nice if the plugin could also work on a local Ghemical
> copy...

Yes, I think it should work both with local and remote servers. So far I
have planned to use sockets for the traffic. As far as I understand
sockets, they are like files; you can read form them and write into them,
and they carry the stuff over a network connection. A port number and an
IP address defines a socket; it could be like

        500:remote.server.net

where "500" is the port number and "remote.server.net" is the IP address
of the remote server. In this case there should be a server process
listening the port 500 in the remote system, which would receive the
requests from plugins and provide the service. But if you wish to run a
local service, you would just use

        500:localhost

and it should work just fine. The plugin user interface would contain a
text box where user could set those above settings.

I have to admit that I have not worked with sockets before, but it doesn't
sound too hard.  :)  All servers (httpd telnet etc) work using the same
priciple I think.

        Tommi



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to