On Thursday 19 February 2004 20:16, Miguel Howard wrote: > Egon wrote: > > I've just removed one of the jmolcdk.jar, which was there also named as > > jmol2cdk.jar, as it is found in CDK cvs. Overthere it was renamed, to > > allow different jars for the b6 branch (jmolcdk.jar) and the HEAD > > branch (jmol2cdk.jar). > > > > The build.xml for Jmol is also adapted to now look for jmol2cdk.jar. > > So, does that mean that the Jmol build now depends upon having CDK > installed and compiled locally?
No, not at all... The library is still in CVS, but there were two instances of basically the same set of classes... well, almost that is... jmol2cdk.jar is intended for HEAD, while jmolcdk.jar is for the b6 branch... There are slight differences in the list of classes... the latter does not need all file IO, for example, because it is still using the Jmol IO classes for that... It's simply that I removed the duplicate... You can still compile Jmol directly from CDK, without having CDK installed... Egon ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
