On 2005-05-18 (17:19) Miguel wrote: >I have put a lot of work into translucent atoms ... had I realized >that i= t was going to be so much work I probably would not have >started :-) > isn't that always the way? ;-)
>I now have uncovered a usability problem and I need your feedback. > >By default, objects inherit the color from the underlying atom. This >applies to bonds, cartoons, almost everything. > >In a simple case, bonds have no color but will inherit the color of >the atom to which they are attached. > >So, if the user executes a command to make the atoms translucent, do >the objects (in this case the bonds) also become translucent? > IMHO the bonds should inherit translucency in this way, yes. my two cents, tim -- Timothy Driscoll molvisions - see, grasp, learn. <http://www.molvisions.com/> usa:north carolina:raleigh "The more I study science, the more I believe in God." - Albert Einstein ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id344&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
