Is this really wise? Seems like some automated tool could refactor this at
a compile-time stage rather than you obfuscating the names for developers.
On 21 February 2013 14:08, Robert Hanson <hans...@stolaf.edu> wrote:
> I'm about to upload a massive refactoring. Mostly the desire is to bring
> down the size of the JavaScript version of Jmol and has nothing to do with
> Java. But classes have been renamed:
>
> ScriptVariable --> SV
> Token --> T
>
> BitSet --> BS
> BitSetUtil --> BSUtil
> Colix --> C
> Point3f --> P3
> Point3fi --> P3i
> StringXBuilder --> SB
> Vector3f --> V3
>
> JmolConstants --> JC
>
> I apologize if this is an inconvenience, but it did knock off about 10% of
> the JavaScript footprint for JSmol.
>
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> --
> Robert M. Hanson
> Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
> Chair, Chemistry Department
> St. Olaf College
> Northfield, MN
> http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
>
>
> If nature does not answer first what we want,
> it is better to take what answer we get.
>
> -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-developers mailing list
> Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
