> > > > In the following page by Eric Martz, you can see how this works in
> > > > Chime.
> > >
> > > > http://www.umass.edu/microbio/chime/chimehow/fs_cmdln.htm
> > >
> > IIRC, if you send a long script to Chime, the messages returning are
> scrambled
> > (IOW, not in the same order as they went to Chime).  I don't recall the
> > details, and maybe this has no bearing on JMol - maybe Paul can say
more?
> >
>
> Of course Tim ! (even if I don't understand what IIRC means...)
>
> The scrambling issue comes with Chime and *Netscape 4.X*
> It's a problem between the plug-in and the browser, independant from
Chime.
> For long scripts, messages returned to a javascript function via the
> MessageCallback method, come back in a wrong order.
> Eric Martz gives examples these idiosynchrasies here
> http://molvis.sdsc.edu/shared/scrambld.txt, and a complete description of
> this behaviour there : http://molvis.sdsc.edu/shared/unscramb.txt
> This problem doesn't occur with IE, nor with mozilla. So it's only
> Chime-Communicator specific.
>
> To solve it, Chime developpers add a third argument to the messagecallback
> method, wich is the number of the message. That is to say, with Chime, the
> function called by messagecallback gets these parameters :
> - 1st : the plugin name
> - 2nd : the message itself
> - 3rd : the message's number as it is adressed by Chime
>
> Some applications using Chime implement functions to reorder the messages,
> using this third parameter.
>
> I think that it's not usefull in Jmol as long as this communication issue
> doesn't exist...
>
> Paul
>




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free!
https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to