I must weigh in here. I'll be surprised if the hundredths place has reasonable significance in any protein crystal structure. Indeed, the tenths decimal place is likely weak in many structures. Remember also that in a distance measurement the uncertainty doubles. We do a disservice to the novice user to present distances to 3 decimal places (OK, even to many non-novice users). It gives them an improper sense of the data. I would prefer a default of 1 decimal place for Angstroms. If a user selects 3 decimal places, an alert should pop up asking them if they know what they're doing ;) Craig Martin P.S. does anyone really believe that gas pumps can measure your purchase to 0.001 gallons (0.8 tsp; 4 mL)?
|
- Re: [Jmol-users] decimal places in measurements Craig T Martin
- Re: [Jmol-users] decimal places in measurements Phillip Barak
- Re: [Jmol-users] decimal places in measurements Hens Borkent
- Re: [Jmol-users] decimal places in measurements Eric Martz