On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Bob Hanson wrote: > > What do people want in relation to "Jmol-11.js" vs. "Jmol.js" ? > Keep it > "Jmol.js" ? Make it "Jmol-11.js" ?
my two cents: I think it is good practice to keep the file name as Jmol.js. otherwise, the default is that all users must modify their sites in order to use the new features of Jmol-11.js. by default, it should be seamless for the majority of users, while advanced users can rename either the old file, or the new file, if desired. as long as Jmol-11.js is backwards compatible with Jmol.js, of course. best, tim -- Timothy Driscoll em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] molvisions - see. grasp. learn. ph: 919-368-2667 <http://www.molvisions.com/> im: molvisions usa:virginia:blacksburg tx: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random digits is, of course, in a state of sin." - J von Neumann ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
