I'm enjoying the beauty of the new translucency with surfaces. But I
find that In Jmol 11.1.21, using the command
isosurface mysurface translucent on
the 'on' throws an error - invalid argument. Probably wants a number
for translucency, right?
But, in Jmol 11.1.18, the 'on' is required to show a surface (loaded
mysurface with a jvxl file) -- if I leave off the 'on' the command is
ineffective - no surface appears. So maybe a backward compatibility
issue?
The inconsistency between Jmol versions is the same using:
isosurface mysurface opaque on
Frieda
///////////////////////////////////////////
Frieda Reichsman, PhD
Molecules in Motion
Interactive Molecular Structures
http://www.moleculesinmotion.com
///////////////////////////////////////////
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
