At 12/13/07, you wrote: >But I think you should be able to LOCK the two models the way you are >suggesting so that either one when you move it drags the other around. >Sort of a mutual sync. I'll have to think about why that is not >happening when you use sync * ON.
Again, my desire is that users confronted with multiple Jmols should not have to think about which one to rotate to maintain alignment. Moving any one should move all of them. A "Synchronize checkbox" is an intuitive way to turn off sync when one wishes to move one molecule relative to another. While I have, in the past, used the one master, one slave mode with Chime, I did that only because I needed to keep MolSlides simple (no checkboxes). In the Jmol Tutorials, we can have a more intuitive interface with the checkbox. So yes, please think about how to "lock" all Jmols. I thought maybe the problem is that if all are syncMouse senders, then when one receives moveto's from another, it may start a postivie feedback loop, sending the same movements back to the sender. ??? Maybe there needs to be some way to suppress such feedback? -Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
