>Amazing! >Thanks for pointing this out, Wayne. I have missed the last two email >ToC for TIBS, which I regularly review. > >Movement of the model is very smooth. The quality of the renderings >is not so good -- must be related to file size, since PyMol can have >a very good quality. >
I too am impressed, particularly with the waypoints (used first in VRML) for viewing particular aspects of the structure. Of course, the advantage of Jmol (amongst many) is that one can extract the actual data used to create a view (coordinates, etc). I might have missed it, but one cannot do this with the PDF version. I can see how publishers might want to use this format, since they retain control, and its nicely "bundled" into a single file. In that sense, the competing method used by eg the American Chemical Society (the "WEO") is more fragile. Bundling a WEO (ie a collection of .jar files + HTML) into an "archive" is possible with some browsers ,but the formats tend to be browser (and quite possible browser version) specific. With recent developments in this area, does anyone know of a standard way of achieving the Acrobat result (ie a single totally functional file) which is reasonably standard? -- Henry Rzepa. +44 (020) 7594 5774 (Voice); http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/rzepa.xrdf (FOAF) http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/ Dept. Chemistry, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK. (Voracious anti-spam filter in operation for received email. If expected reply not received, please phone/fax). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
