From: Robert Hanson <hans...@st...> - 2010-01-03 02:45
>Nice! Let's see if we can tighten that code up a bit....
Thanks. It definitely needs some work. A couple of things that
glaringly need to be fixed if this is to become part of Jmol.js: 1)I
haven't extracted everything I had to put in to work around the
asynchronous nature of the SAGE server (although I think I've got most
of it); 2) I am not using all the facilities already included in
Jmol.js, especially some of the things done to handle older browsers;
3) I've only tested it well with FireFox and Safari, so far. I also
think we may want to consider changing the syntax a little to match
other Jmol.js function calls better.
If the response continues to be positive, we should definitely work on
this and move the code discussion to the developers list.
Jonathan
Dr. Jonathan H. Gutow
Chemistry Department [email protected]
UW-Oshkosh Office:920-424-1326
800 Algoma Boulevard FAX:920-424-2042
Oshkosh, WI 54901
http://www.uwosh.edu/facstaff/gutow
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
