OK Steve, that's clear now. Wow! 2007! Time really flies.
Let's see. Your approach is reasonable, but all comes to what the putJmolDiv() function is doing. It calls popInJmol(n,molName,fileName) which is designed to use the "load" command + the filename. I'm not confident what load does with a script file. The safe way is using the "script" command instead. So easiest solution is to edit the pop_Jmol.js file and add a new alternative function. But then you have to cope with calling one or the other depending on if yu want to use a model filename or a script filename. I could put a filter so that the file extension is used to decide, but that's not too wise given that Jmol doesn't care about extensions, so other people might use any extension. How about a new version that uses function putJmolDiv(molNr, molName, molFileName, scripFileName) ? That would be made backwards compatible, if the last parameter is omiited. For your case, you would call it omitting the model like in putJmolDiv(0,'one2one','', '/sites/files/jmolfiles/one2one.spt') What do you think? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
