This is the first I've heard about PWF. There are some slides by Helen Berman about it here:
http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/general_information/about_pdb/rcsbpdbac10-presentations.pdf Eric At 4/21/12, you wrote: >Content-Language: en-US >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="_000_DA18B365B7F24FEBAC31246EE3E79B03weizmannacil_" > >Maybe we don't need to invest too much on mmCIF support, and >concentrate on the upcoming PWF (wwPDB Working Format). > >This might be the new format that (based on an undisclosed source), >PDB is seeking to get the crystallographic community approval on. >When, how and if this will happen is unknown to me. > >Jaim > >On Apr 21, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Kevin Theisen wrote: >>Hi Bob, >>It appears FF4 is mmCIF, which we do not support (at least not >>yet). I will have to do some more study of the CIF format to make >>sure I understand why there are so many variations, but currently, >>if your file matches the core CIF spec, then it will load without >>issue: <http://it.iucr.org/G/>http://it.iucr.org/G/ >>Bests, >>Kevin > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. >Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. >Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! >http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 >_______________________________________________ >Jmol-users mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
