Bob,
The ability to load minimal with the possibility of expanding as needed would
be wonderful!
Otis
--
Otis Rothenberger
o...@chemagic.com
http://chemagic.com
On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:23 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> I'm wondering if we should try to produce a really trimmed-down "lite"
> version of Jmol -- a very very minimal core set of functionality that could
> have better load performance on mobile devices for very basic tasks.
>
> Maybe just
>
> wireframe
> spacefill
> balls&sticks
> no text
> no math (just simple "Rasmol-like" script commands)
> just XYZ/MOL file reading
>
> (basically a ChemDoodle-HTML5-only-like level of capability)
>
> What would be a reasonable goal for code size?
>
> Suggestions?
>
> (I think I could make it to automatically load additional functionality as
> needed.)
>
> Bob
>
>
> --
> Robert M. Hanson
> Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
> Chair, Chemistry Department
> St. Olaf College
> Northfield, MN
> http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
>
>
> If nature does not answer first what we want,
> it is better to take what answer we get.
>
> -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan_______________________________________________
> Jmol-users mailing list
> Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
