Specific answers:
Grossman, Robert B wrote: > So you need Java running on the client, but not enabled in the > browser. Is that right? No. There is no use of Java when you go for JSmol. Amjad Farooq wrote: > In other words, Jmol2.js runs Java > from the server side? Is that correct? No. Jmol2.js (which is Javascript) adapts your (old) page to use JSmol (no Java) instead fo Jmol (Java applet). > if Jmol2.js can eliminate the need for client to have a fully > functional Java, then why do I need to to switch to JSmol? You ARE switching to JSmol, either by manually writing your pages or by using Jmol2.js to adapt your old pages without changing therm. Grossman, Robert B wrote: > So with this new JSmol, all the Java is now running server-side, is > that correct? No. Nothing running in the server. > I no longer have to worry about whether the user's Java > is enabled? Yes. No worries. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
