At 15:30 -0600 1/21/02, Dave Rolsky wrote: > >Actually, I don't want jobs posted at all that aren't for actual money. I >think Ask and Uri would agree with me there.
That's OK by me. I could be convinced wither way as long as there's a policy. > >However, this was posted >a long itme back (3-4 months). The reason it went out again is that they >updated the description. When that happens it has to be approved again. > >When I re-approve old postings I often update their 'post date' and resend >them to the list, because I think it should be treated more or less like a >new posting. That's cool. I like seeing things when they are reposted. Too bad nobody pointed out back in September that this one sounded like a Wimpey-burger kind of job. -- - Vicki Vicki Brown ZZZ Journeyman Sourceror: P.O. Box 1269 zz |\ _,,,---,,_ Scripts & Philtres San Bruno, CA zz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Perl, Unix, MacOS 94066 USA |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] '---''(_/--' `-'\_) http://www.cfcl.com/~vlb
