At 01:28 PM 1/23/02 -0500, Uri Guttman wrote: >nah, we already crossed it. i take bribes to accept posts. i need the $$
Funny Uri. Only having a blacklist as per one suggestion is against the law, isn't it? Even on a privately owned list as was pointed out this is? Personally I think barring folks that are openly abusive e.g. a recruiter who shall remain nameless makes good sense. OTOH trying to figure out which jobs are worthy of posting may please some and displease others. Which leads me to the my "Inverse Salt Thesis" of job boards. Thanks for asking. According to the "Inverse Salt Thesis" jobs should be posted with the opposite philosophy of adding salt to food. Whereas salt is easy to add, hard to remove from a prepared food thus behooving the caring cook to add the minimum absolutely required, job postings are easy to remove and hard to add. Therefore a job board should add all the postings it can and leave it to the members to decide which are worthy of their time and effort. Otherwise I'm afraid there may one day be moderated and unmoderated Perl job boards, and that'd just make my filter list longer still. :) Lorem ipsum, Marty Website Creation Made SIMPL(tm) http://face2interface.com/Home/Demo.shtml Complementary Color Picker http://face2interface.com/WebSafe
