Hi Ignacio! > * The persisters extend EnhancedUserType, but they could extend > UserType (the extra methods are not used) > I am still not sure about it. The documentation of EnhancedUserType shows, that such types can be used as identifier or discriminator, so I assumed that this is not the case for simple UserTypes. I can't find anything more about it in the source code and it looks like the documentation is wrong here. Anyway, I don't understand why we should NOT use the EnhancedUserType, that way we can make use of the "to" and "from" string stuff hibernate will use for some xml magic.
> * The implementation of each persister are very much the same, so they > could extend a single abstract class and add only a couple of methods. > The total code size shrinks to about 50% > Ok, ok, I know, I am lazy. Sorry for this. I'll have a look at it. > * I also used the Hibernate type naming pattern (DurationType, > LocalTimeType) but that is a matter of taste and I really don't care > much anyway. > I don't know why I used the Persist* naming, I'll have a look at it too. What do others think about this topic? > Thanks for giving this some time, Mario Thanks for helping making it better :-) Ciao, Mario ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Joda-interest mailing list Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
