Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > On Mar 1, 2007, at 24:38 , Stephen Colebourne wrote: > >> Fabrizio Giudici wrote: >>> Nevertheless I didn't understand whether >>> Joda time is able to represent such a date as 1.500.000.000 B.C, even >>> with a (much) lower precision. Remember that I want to keep a single >>> representation (i.e. a single number) for every date, and I don't >>> want to switch to variant schemas for dates before/after a certain >>> threshold. >> Joda-Time really doesn't provide any support for dates beyond the >> specified range. Which I'd like to look at again in JSR-310. > > Ok. This is due to 2^63 / 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000, right?
Yes. Joda-Time is all based around a long. Stephen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Joda-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
