In a message dated 12/26/01 4:56:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 2) from a technical POV, what would fix this is all content assumed to be > NJC > unless specified otherwise. That way, instead of an "NJC" tag, we would > put > a "JC" tag on anything with Joni content. I think that would eliminate the > "false positive" Joni content. But then you'd have the other problem; some > JC would go unlabeled because people would forget. what do all of you > think > about this? > > Mary K > I endorse this suggestion. Paul I
