Here's a gut wrenching view that's different from all the conservative
items posted recently:

How the Coming War Stacks Up
Blood, Stats and Tears

http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0306/harkavy.php

>From this week's Village Voice, with an accompanying article about the
effects of the war:

http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0306/solomon.php

Both of these articles disprove the Canadian columnist's contention in
an item recently posted to the list that people in the U.S. are
unconcerned about the effects of the war. See, being a columnist, he
really didn't look for anything that ran counter to the point he was
trying to prove.

And, coming from the Village Voice, of course both of the articles above
have a left-wing bias.

One stat listed explains one question I've had about the plan to bomb
Iraq. If Bush and cronies are so certain there are chemical and
biological weapons in Iraq, isn't the bombing going to release some of
that from their containers?  Bushies are certain huge stockpiles exist
and yet they supposedly don't know where any of it is located so it's
not as though bombs could be "programmed" to avoid those stockpiles
(assuming bombs can be programmed to always accurately hit a particular
target, and experience has shown that's not possible).

So, when thousands of people die from having all of that existing
chemical and biological substance released into the air, is the U.S.
responsible because U.S. bombs released it all?  I say yes.

Being untrusting of the official word our government sometimes gives us,
I imagine that if such substances are released, that the U.S. government
will claim that Iraqis somehow did it, even though they'll probably all
be dead or in bomb shelters, if there are such protected areas there.
We're being set up already to believe that it will be entirely and
solely the Iraqis actions if chemical or biological weapons are
released. I don't buy it.

Anyway, among the chilling collection of stats is this one:

"Number of U.S. Army soldiers ready to decontaminate corpses and send
them back home for burial: 700" 

Great, looks like the U.S. has got it covered.

I think I'm going to throw up now.

Debra Shea

Reply via email to