> I'm still evaluating options regarding this issue here. Options > proposed so far would have a major impact on the API strategy (meaning > of Configuration / Settings), so I'd like to avoid them in a minor > release. I've asked a question on Stack Overflow to see if there are > alternatives: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11483993/is-there-an-alternative-to-loading-a-class-with-class-forname
... and there is already an answer! Could you please check if this will work for your set up? http://stackoverflow.com/a/11484093/521799 My integration tests (using Eclipse classloaders) work fine with that Cheers Lukas
