If I could use this to map between jOOQ Record and other types that might be useful, but my biggest challenge is mapping Records to Google's Protobuf structures which aren't anywhere near standard POJO style unfortunately. I'm not sure I see this being able to help that. :-)
As for Record to Record, 1 to Many or what have you relations, I'm pretty happy with what jOOQ has right now. In particular, I hope you can continue to support the string based mapping I'm using for Postgres partitioning, obviously. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
