2013/4/2 Peter Ertl <[email protected]>: > suggestion #1 (concerning the package of Factory): > > I would not expect 'Factory' to sit in 'org.jooq.impl' but in 'org.jooq' > (impl should be the place for internal stuff, implementations of public > interfaces and such)
I'd like that too, but then I'd need something like OSGi to hide the impl package from the outside, as everything would need to be made public. It's too bad that another technial reason had to be the driving force for a jOOQ "feature"... > suggestion #2 (concerning the name): > > [[ SQL ]] > > - it's short > - it kind of tells the mission goal of jOOQ (bring back sql to java) > - no class with same name in the JDK or any major framework I know of > > code sample: > > executor.select(SQL.max(TABLE.ID)).from(TABLE)... > > I think it reads pretty nice :-) OK, I'll comment on that later. Let's see what others think. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
