I encountered the field comparison issue when I "hacked" QualifiedTable to be able to specify an Identity. But I reverted these changes so I cannot test it right now.
Regarding Identity, why must the return value of getField() be a TableField? Identity also has a getTable() so that information is redundant. All usages of getField() that I found either only require a Field or cast the value to Field. So can we change the return type to Field? Am Samstag, 6. April 2013 22:04:05 UTC+2 schrieb Lukas Eder: > > 2013/4/6 Sven Jacobs <[email protected] <javascript:>>: > > > >> How about TemporaryTable.this.field("ID")? > > > > > > field() returns a Field but a TableField is required. So I'm still stuck > :'( > > Would be much easier if TableFieldImpl were public ;-) > > Yeah. It would be easier for a couple of minutes. Then you'd start > hacking around with those internals and everything would explode ;-) > > I've updated issue #2374 with a new comment. > https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/2374#issuecomment-16003012 > > This suggestion might be a solution to your issue where your > QualifiedField isn't equal to the required TableField > Could you please provide some feedback on that? > > Cheers > Lukas > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
