Hello, As you've noted yourself, jOOQ 3.0 and 3.1 releases were not integration tested with DB2. Recommending to prefer jOOQ 2.6 is just a disclaimer from my side. The choice is up to you.
Chances are, that this lack of integration test coverage might have introduced 1-2 regressions or incomplete implementations of new 3.x functionality. So far, however, I am not aware of such regressions reported by users. Now, by using jOOQ only as a SQL builder, you can of course further reduce the chances of running into such problems. Regards, Lukas 2013/9/19 g savan <gksa...@gmail.com> > Hello, > > Which version of JOOQ is good for DB2 9.7 SQL building . > > I want to use JOOQ as just SQL Building. > > Release not of 3.0 says that "Integration testing not done for DB2, prefer > to use 2.6" > > As I just using as SQL Builder, Is it okay to use JOOQ 3.1? > > Thank you. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jOOQ User Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to jooq-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jooq-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
