On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Lukas Eder <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, we'll see. I tend to think that NoSQL folks will realise that the SQL > language is very well suited for most problems.
I'm not claiming to be an architect, but FWIW I'm working on an app where some of the data is storage and queried in Cassandra and some stored and queried in Postgres. I just didn't feel like compromising, so I used both. > I usually cite Mark Madsen > in this context :-) > http://www.nosql-vs-sql.com/#no-tation > > Of course, the above marketing website is not to be taken too seriously... > (before I trigger another flame-war) :-) Given my previous statement, I'll quite happily sit on the fence. But use JOOQ when dealing with SQL :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
