2015-05-21 11:03 GMT+02:00 Sujeevan Nagarajah <[email protected]>: > Thanks Ben and Lukas. This is great stuff. Will definitely keep me busy > for next few days :) My comments below. > > On Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 3:24:59 PM UTC+8, Lukas Eder wrote: >> >> Clearly, Liquibase is providing a similar idea of SQL migration as jOOQ >> does, although Liquibase probably has a richer DDL API right now. This will >> certainly change as we add support for more DDL features. >> > > I use Liquibase in another module in a normal way. I haven't thought about > your idea which is very clever. However I'm still uncertain how much > Liquibase offers in terms of Redshift dialect. I'll explore further. >
Excellent! If you have Liquibase on your stack anyway, that's going to be a good solution for now. Would be very interesting to hear about your experience here on the user group! On Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 10:12:23 PM UTC-7, Sujeevan Nagarajah wrote: >>>> >>>> Thank you Lukas. Now I understand the primary use case of jOOQ >>>> createTable feature. >>>> >>>> Typical application has a fixed schema or schema that rarely changes. >>>> Also when there is a change, schema changes applied during application >>>> start. >>>> But my use case is totally different from it. I'm working on a feature >>>> where schema of a dataset is detected and corresponding table is created in >>>> run-time. Since the schema is generated programatically in runtime, I'm >>>> looking for some kind of Java DSL library like jOOQ createTable. Obviously >>>> Flyway can be useful here to manage the schema generated by DSL but it >>>> doesn't help to generate it. What would you recommend for my use-case? An >>>> idea I have is to do some String manipulation on the table statement result >>>> generated by jOOQ. >>>> >>> >> Thank you for these clarifications. That certainly makes sense. >> >> Well probably, there are other databases that have similar flags at the >> same syntactic location. Also, we still have an open issue to support >> inline constraints as well in jOOQ 3.7. I think we can look into this for >> the next release and make this work for you: >> https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/4298 >> > > As usual, thanks Lukas for making things happen. This is my most preferred > solution in the future. I'll be happy to test and provide feedback when you > decided to implement. > Well, I will be very happy to ask you for feedback :) Cheers, Lukas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
