Hi Sam, Thank you very much for your honest feedback. Too bad you don't know why your management didn't like the license model. We are always open to alternative, tailor-made models where our standard models don't make sense.
In any case, should you decide to go ahead with commercial licensing plans again, just do let us know and we're very happy to discuss. I wish you an excellent Holiday season, Lukas 2015-12-23 17:35 GMT+01:00 <[email protected]>: > Or better, you upgrade to the jOOQ Professional Edition! >> > > We looked into that when we first started using jOOQ (we were on Redshift > using Postgres drivers), but Redshift wasn't officially supported at the > time and management didn't like the licensing model (the license per dev > machine, not the price; I don't exactly know why; above my pay grade). Now > we're on MySQL, so the Redshift incentive's gone away. I am listing the > professional edition as an option, but for purely selfish reasons I'm > hoping I can push people into using Java 8. Not that we won't potentially > do both; there is growing support for paying for jOOQ even if we don't have > to just because of how great jOOQ is, and it's likely we'll need Redshift > support again in the future. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jOOQ User Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
