On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 8:57:09 AM UTC+1, Lukas Eder wrote:
>
> Hi Joseph,
>
> 2016-01-04 23:01 GMT+01:00 <[email protected] <javascript:>>:
>
>> Hi Lukas
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your answer :)
>>
>> My use case is explained there
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jooq-user/I9iLbMQNN8o => I want
>> to have the current domain classes extend the latest version.
>>
>
> OK. I still think it's a bad idea in the long run :-)
>
agreed :)
I'm now thinking of copy/pasting the latest model in both the "current"
model folder and the vX folder
no need to extend anymore then, happy Sir ?
>
> However, to link with your discussion on the next model generation
>> approach, maybe the new one could favor composition by extending some
>> interface and then, internally, just have a private instance of the actual
>> impl and delegate to it. It would be pretty easy to do I guess and feels
>> like rather clean as far as I see it.
>>
>
> Interfaces can't have attributes, so that would require adding nasty
> parentheses behind every reference:
>
> CATALOG().SCHEMA().TABLE().COLUMN()
>
>
> Unless I'm missing something?
>
a bit
I'm thinking of the following impl (dirty pseudo code) :
public class FlywayTest implements Schema {
private final SchemaImpl schemaImpl = new SchemaImpl("FlywayTest");
@Override
public final List<Sequence<?>> getSequences() {
return schemaImpl.getSequences();
}
(...)
}
=> hence SchemaImpl could be anywhere in your own package structure and
jar. Way harder to fiddle with and no internal leaking.
>
> Look at it from the bright side.
>
You mean this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGdGFtwCNBE ? Doesn't feel
too funny ;)
>
>
>> It doesn't feel like it (no AOP, proxy or whatnot around, no funky cache
>> or internals as far as I see it). If it's the case, a short explanation in
>> the generated class would be nice
>>
>
> In *every* class? ;-)
>
well I'm this kind of guy ;) Naah, kidding. No need anymore, I got your
point.
>
> But it is a good idea to add a manual section when this is implemented:
> https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/4902
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FjOOQ%2FjOOQ%2Fissues%2F4902&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGlYl6VHLUEB1dXQvaI2GwLmQrnng>
>
hopefully I helped a bit :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
