2016-06-02 15:55 GMT+02:00 Denis Miorandi <[email protected]>:
> I've tried second approach. Sql is generated as expected and query > executed, but resultset are not typed as expected. > I.e. LocalDateTime types are java.sql.TimeStamp and so on.... > Oh, indeed. I'm sorry I overlooked that. There's a pending feature request to allow for passing the result record type to a plain SQL query: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/4473 Other than that, jOOQ doesn't know what kind of result it will get when you run plain SQL queries. Do you think ExecuteListener approach would run into same issue? If you > think not i could try it. > No, that just modifies the rendered SQL without jOOQ noticing, so you will get the expected record type. Lukas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
