> > So far, this was just a very high level sketch. Let's assume we'd be going > this way. There would be two new alternative transaction APIs: A blocking > one and a non-blocking one. The blocking one might look just like JDBC or > JTA: > > Transaction transaction = ctx.beginTransaction(); > ctx.insert()... > ctx.update()... > > Savepoint savepoint = transaction.savepoint(); > > ctx.delete()... > transaction.commit(); > > At the time we discussed this, I have forgotten to create an issue in the issue tracker. Here it is: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/5376
There has also been a related question on Stack Overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/q/38134201/521799 We should definitely add this API as an alternative to the existing transaction API. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
